Monday, August 20, 2007

Some comments about Bonds

So after my last posting, it seems that some of my fans (well, George, at least) are requesting that I give my opinion on Barry Bonds and his breaking of Hank Aaron’s all-time home run record. So, here it is.
I do not like Barry Bonds as a baseball player at all. I will give one example to illustrate just why I do not like him. In the first game that Jonny and I went to in AT&T Park when the Giants were playing the Rockies, someone from Colorado (I believe it was Matt Holliday, but I don’t recall precisely,) hit a deep shot toward left center field. Bonds plays left field, and that day, the Giants center fielder was Randy Winn, who is a pretty good player and has above average range in the outfield. Well, Winn was able to make a fairly difficult running catch at the warning track for the out. Normally, on a difficult play like this one, the left fielder would run over to provide backup in the event that the center fielder was unable to make the catch or if the ball took a weird bounce off of the wall, or something like that. Well, Bonds didn’t take one step! You get the idea that he’s more concerned about his stats than winning by seeing plays like this. Of course, there’s also the steroid issue, which, although anyone has yet to give smoking-gun evidence, it would be difficult for anyone to believe that his stats shot up as dramatically as they did at the age of 36 without some sort of less-than-natural aid.
However, that being said, I do not feel that any sort of asterisk should be put next to his records in the record books just because of these steroid allegations. The game of baseball has undergone a lot of different trends and shifts since the National League was founded in 1876, and a glance at the record books will show this. For example, when you look at many of the pitching records, such as career wins or starts, you will see that many of the record holders played in the Dead-ball era, a time before Babe Ruth made the Home Run a “sexier” part of the game. During this era in baseball, games were played in parks with fences that were very deep, such as the Polo Grounds in New York and Forbes Field in Pittsburgh, and the same ball was used until it was hit into the stands. These were distinct disadvantages for hitters.
Cy Young has the record for wins with 511 (he pitched between 1890 and 1911, the heart of the Dead-ball era.) The closest active player is Roger Clemens, who is at 353 and in 8th place all time. If Clemens were to make a serious bid for Cy Young’s record, he would have to win 15 games per year for the next 11 seasons. Given that Clemens is 44 years old and probably won’t pitch until he’s 59, we can say that Mr. Young is safe. You see, in Cy Young’s time, pitchers would pitch more frequently, and usually pitched all nine innings, whereas today most starting pitchers pitch every fifth game and rarely go for more than seven innings. As a result, Cy Young holds a bevy of other records, such as complete games, innings pitched, batters faced, and losses (and Pud Gavin, another hall of famer from the Dead Ball Era ( he pitched between 1875-1892,) is second in most of them, too.) Other pitchers from the dead-ball era comprise the bulk of the top fifty on all of these record lists. (This is why Bert Blyleven, who has 287 Career wins and is 5th all time in strikeouts (both of which are ahead of many hall of fame pitchers,) really deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, considering the era he played in (and all the bad teams he played for.) But, that's a whole other blog posting.)
The spitball, however, was one of the biggest factors that made the Dead-ball era what it was. It is illegal now for a pitcher to alter the ball with sandpaper, petroleum jelly, or any other foreign substance that helps a pitcher put a crazier spin on the ball, thus making it more difficult to hit. The spitball was banned in 1920, although several spitball pitchers were grandfathered out (remember the World Series last year and the controversy over the smudge on Kenny Rogers' pitching hand?) This is considered cheating now. Therefore, you could argue that all pitchers who pitched before 1920 should have an asterisk, because pitchers today don't have the same advantages.
In addition to this, certain batting records are equally safe (if not safer) – namely, triples. Deeper fences in the ballparks before World War II made triples far more common than they are today. If you look at the top fifty career triples hitters, only two, the immortal Roberto Clemente and Stan Musial, played after World War II. The top active player on the career triples list is Steve Finley of the Rockies, who is 90th overall. The all-time record holder is “Wahoo” Sam Crawford (a hall of famer, by the way,) who hit 309 triples playing for the Reds and Tigers between 1899 and 1917.

Bonds played in the steroid era – there were lots of players, and many very talented ones, using steroids. On top of all of this, better training methods and shorter fences in the ballparks have made the long ball more common. This is a trend in the game (albeit an illegal one.) If they decide to put an asterisk, Cy Young, Pud Gavin, and "Wahoo" Sam Crawford also deserve asterisks. In fact, all of the records deserve asterisks - they all must be considered in the historical context of when they were set.
  Not to mention that baseball was segregated during this time period.  It's hard to believe that someone like Satchel Paige would not have set more than a few records, had he been allowed to pitch the bulk of his career in the Major Leagues, among many others.  So, you could argue that any records before 1947 deserve asterisks.  
  If Bonds had been the only one using steroids, then all the righteous indignation would be justified. However, he was not – he’s the best hitter from an era when many players were juicing and hitting the ball deep - the context of the time in which the record was set. Therefore, Bonds one day deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, next to other unpopular and controversial figures like Ty Cobb. This is my opinion.

Monday, August 06, 2007

Baseball in the Bay Area



I've had the opportunity to go to several baseball games since I've come to California - living such a short distance from two ball parks means that nearly every day during the season, one can go to a baseball game. About as good as it can get!

There's a definite contrast between games in Oakland and games in San Francisco. The Giants get much more attention, mostly because of Bonds and the more beautiful ball park, AT&T Park. However, I like the A's games much better. Sure, McAfee Coliseum is an ugly, 1960's ballpark built purely for efficiency, not aesthetics. Instead of having bars and restaurants around it, there are freight yards and warehouses. However, the fans are there for the baseball, not for the beautiful ballpark or just to see Barry Bonds hit. They discuss the penant race, not their investments or what's happening on American Idol (which they seem to do at AT&T Park.) To give one example, at the Giants-Braves game pictured below, Barry Bonds came to bat in the 8th inning of a 4-2 game, with the Braves leading. Bonds hit a single, and Ryan Klesko, who is an aging slugger, came to the plate. He could have tied the game. Instead, a large percentage of the fans left. True, the Giants are one of the worst teams in baseball this year, but I thought that summed up a lot of what going to a Giants game is all about for most people.

Here are some pictures I took with my camera. They aren't terribly impressive, compared to many you will see in Sports Illustrated and the like, but when you consider the size and tiny zoom lens on that camera, they really aren't too bad.
Posted by Picasa

The Ageless Julio Franco


The very first baseball game I ever went to was at the Metrodome in Minneapolis in August of 1988. The Twins played the Cleveland Indians, and the Twins won by a score of 10-4. Julio Franco, who's now 48 years old, was starting at second base for Cleveland that night, and even hit a home run. (I will never forget this because there was this really drunk guy behind us, who kept yelling "Boo-lio!" every time Franco came to bat.) So, Julio Franco played in the first baseball game I ever went to, and one of the most recent. He's kind of like the Alpha and the Omega, from my perspective, in that way.
Posted by Picasa

The Bay Bridge, as seen from the ballpark

Posted by Picasa

They HATE the Dodgers in these parts

Posted by Picasa

Big Bob Wickman, Braves closer

Posted by Picasa

Bonds, when he was at 753

Posted by Picasa

John Smoltz, future Hall-of-Fame pitcher with the Braves, and Ryan Klesko

Posted by Picasa

Matt Cain of the Giants, warming up before the game

Posted by Picasa

The kid's field at AT&T Park - lots of activities for the kids at the park

Posted by Picasa

The address for AT&T Park

Posted by Picasa

McCovey Cove Kayakers

Posted by Picasa

Nick Swisher of the A's, at first base

Posted by Picasa

Submarine reliever for the Orioles, warming up in the 'pen

Posted by Picasa

The Kayaks in McCovey Cove

Posted by Picasa

A view of beautiful AT&T Park

Posted by Picasa

The All-Time Home Run standings, as of early June. As you all know, Bonds, the most hated man in Baseball, is now tied with Aaron.

Later that game, Bonds hit #746.
Posted by Picasa

Our view, from the super-cheap seats. Thankfully, at AT&T Park, there is lots of good standing room, so we didn't freeze up here for too long.

Posted by Picasa

Kaz Matsui of the Rockies, leading off

Posted by Picasa

The scoreboard at AT&T Park, with Giant's Rookie Fred Lewis in the foreground

Posted by Picasa

Noah Lowry of the Giants

Posted by Picasa

Noah Lowry of the Giants

Posted by Picasa

Warming up in the 'pen

Posted by Picasa

Bonds, popping up against the Rockies

Posted by Picasa

Bonds at bat

Posted by Picasa

Jason Kubel in Left Field

Posted by Picasa